University websites are more vulnerable than most marketers realize. Decentralized publishing creates hundreds of ungoverned domains — each a potential security and brand liability. There's a version of this conversation that treats web security as purely an IT issue. This isn’t that version.
read

What higher-education marketers can do about hidden university web risks

Content strategy Digital marketing Governance Higher education challenges Tips & advice Web development

The nightmare scenario for a higher-education IT team is a cyberattack that could bring down your entire website.

Yet most university website security vulnerabilities aren’t the result of such targeted attacks; it’s decentralized publishing that’s often the main culprit.

Web decentralization in college and university settings is a reality, and often an asset, but it can cause serious headaches for your marketing efforts when left ungoverned.

And while overall web security remains an IT responsibility, you as higher-ed marketers can still play a meaningful role in reducing the risks it creates.

Those risks have a familiar shape (and we write about this a lot):

  • Digital sprawl
  • Brand inconsistency
  • Enrollment exposure

The good news is that marketing already owns and influences what counts the most: governance oversight, ownership, brand standards, the student experience, and lifecycle management across the whole digital landscape.

That’s not a stretch of your mandate; it’s the natural extension of it.

The scale of the problem is bigger than most teams realise

A college or university’s web presence includes much more than just its main website, of course.

You'll also have department pages, microsites, faculty sites, student org pages, legacy subsites, forgotten domains, campaign landing pages, and more.

When you're focused on the central site, which is where most marketing energy naturally goes, it's easy to lose track of what's accumulating at the edges.

Yet these peripheral properties can have an outsized effect not only on your institution’s brand but on its cybersecurity.

And problem areas can multiply quickly.

  • A forgotten faculty sites running an unpatched plugin
  • An abandoned student org pages with no active owner
  • A department microsites never handed back after a rebranding initiative
  • Temporary campaign sites that quietly became permanent
  • Web properties left adrift when staff members leave

Formal governance or oversight is lacking to catch any of it.

This creates monitoring gaps, inconsistent security policies, and unmanaged technology deployments.

None of these show up on a marketing dashboard, but all can land on the marketing team’s desk when something goes wrong.

The numbers

Research from cybersecurity firms suggests that in the United States in 2023  the top 100 universities had an average of 1,580 domains each. The top 500 averaged 616. The top 1,500 averaged 244.

These are all potential entry points for threats.

Across the top 500 and top 100 universities, approximately 3.7% of domains were unmaintained — a share that sounds modest until you apply it to an institution running 1,580 domains, where it represents roughly 60 abandoned properties, each a potential entry point.

The software running on those domains is often just as concerning as the volume.

Software with known exploited vulnerabilities was detected at 48% of all universities and 70% of the top 500.

Among the top 500 universities, an average of 30 domains were using end-of-life PHP — software that hadn’t been updated in years and for which security patches no longer exist.

The broader threat environment reflects this exposure.

Known ransomware attacks in the U.S. against K-12 and higher education more than doubled from 2022 to 2023, from 129 to 265. The average cost of a data breach in higher education stood at roughly US$3.65 million, while the average downtime caused by ransomware rose from 7.9 days to 11.6 days between 2022 and 2023.

Decentralisation isn't the problem; but governed decentralisation is.

The decentralization of university websites is not, in itself, a liability.

Higher-ed institutions are decentralized by nature, and that flexibility is genuinely valuable: fundraising and campaign teams need to move quickly, research centers need their own presence, and academic departments have legitimate reasons to publish independently.

The problem isn't decentralization. It's decentralization without governance.

What can marketers do about any of this? More than you might think — because your team already owns the levers that matter most:

  • Brand trust and standards
  • Digital governance frameworks
  • Student experience and journey continuity
  • Recruitment continuity
  • Institutional reputation

The goal isn’t to centralize everything. It’s to make sure that whatever is published under your institution’s name meets a baseline standard of currency, accessibility, and security hygiene.

Brand implications

While cybersecurity remains an IT issue in terms of technical response, its consequences land squarely in your marketing territory.

A breach, a defaced page, or an outdated subdomain doesn’t just create a security incident — it creates a brand incident.

Some of the most common brand risks hiding in plain sight:

  • Outdated program information that contradicts your current offerings
  • Broken online forms at the exact moment a prospective student tries to apply
  • Dead-end web journeys that send recruits elsewhere
  • Inconsistent visual identity across a dozen unrelated microsites
  • Inaccessible content that violates WCAG standards and exposes legal risk
  • Duplicate or conflicting pages competing against each other in search results
  • Old campaign pages with expired offers still indexed and ranking

Each of these is, on its own, a manageable problem.

But together, they compose a fragmented digital identity that undermines the expensive brand-building work your team is doing everywhere else.

And the real-world consequences can be severe.

One long-standing institution was forced to close in 2022 after a ransomware attack compounded COVID-era financial pressures. The attack thwarted admissions activities and blocked access to all institutional data.

On a larger scale, the MOVEit file-transfer vulnerability exploited in 2023–24 allowed attackers to exfiltrate data from the National Student Clearinghouse, impacting nearly 900 U.S. colleges and universities.

In each case, the IT response and the communications response had to run in parallel…and the reputational damage was felt well beyond the security team.

This is a marketing issue...and an investment worth making

As marketers, your influence on brand standards can extend to web standards. The two are really inseparable when your higher ed institution’s digital footprint spans hundreds of domains.

In decentralized systems, technical security should be left to experts at the university level. But content creation, publishing authority, and lifecycle management can — and should — involve marketing.

This isn’t overreach. It closes the governance gap that exists between IT’s responsibility for security and marketing’s responsibility for brand.

In practice, it means your IT and marketing teams need to be better aligned around the governance of the digital system, with joint ownership of a web publisher policy and shared accountability for what gets published under your university or college’s name.

Some practical steps

Here are non-technical actions you can take that sit squarely within a marketing mandate:

  • Audit every domain and subdomain with IT: You can’t govern what you haven’t inventoried.  This step typically surfaces surprises, and it's the foundation on which everything else depends on. Our post on unlocking the power of domain discovery covers why this matters beyond security — for brand consistency and SEO too.
  • Build a web publisher policy: Define who can launch a site, what CMS platforms are approved, what brand and accessibility standards apply, and how sites get formally decommissioned. EDUCAUSE offers governance frameworks that can serve as a starting point.
  • Add security compliance to your digital brand standards toolkit: If a site doesn’t meet your brand standards — outdated visual identity, no SSL, broken accessibility — it shouldn’t be live. These criteria can be applied by marketing without requiring deep technical expertise.
  • Establish a page lifecycle policy with 12-to-18-month review checkpoints: Require active reconfirmation of ownership for any site within your institutional namespace. If no one claims ownership, it gets decommissioned.
  • Reframe security to leadership in enrollment risk language, not technical language: Using security language closes doors, while using enrollment language opens them. Framing ungoverned web properties as a recruitment risk that can lead to, for example, broken journeys, missing pages, or lost applicants, makes a far stronger budget case than talking about attack surfaces.

The case for investment

In a recent survey of 268 institutions, as of 2023, large schools averaged US$4.1 million in annual marketing budgets — significant sums that can be quietly undermined by a single compromised subdomain or an abandoned microsite outranking the official program page.

Brand amplification consistently ranks among the top priorities for higher-ed chief marketing officers, yet digital governance rarely makes the budget conversation even though it enables everything else.

A clean, well-governed digital presence is one of the most cost-effective brand investments a university can make:

  • It protects the recruitment funnel.
  • It preserves the integrity of the brand identity you’re spending millions to build.
  • It closes the gap between the institution you’re marketing and the institution a prospective student actually encounters when they start clicking.

The good news is that higher ed marketing already has the standing to lead this work: the relationships, the brand authority, and the student-experience mandate are all in place.
What’s sometimes missing is the formal claim to the governance conversation…and the argument that web security is, in fact, a marketing issue too.

The risks are real, the tools are available, and the mandate already exists. Higher-ed marketers who step into the governance conversation now won't just be protecting their institution's digital presence; they’ll be defining what responsible, future-ready marketing leadership looks like.